Home

Advertisement

Customize
Steve Prosapio
07 November 2008 @ 12:23 pm

The election is over and I'm finally able to think about baseball without puking. The talk here in San Diego is huge about a Peavy trade and as a Cubs fan, I'd be really stoked to get him. But it's not enough!

I'm sick of the curse talk. THIS is why we lose -- BAD DECISIONS. Remember this is the same team that decided to keep Bob Howry and Neal Cotts...
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/player/gamelogs/2008/7593

Look at May and June. Scott Eyre set a CLUB RECORD for most appearances without giving up a run -- he got hurt. Then he gets ONE CHANCE to pitch before they cut him?!?!?!! Then he goes to the Phils and goes 9 appearances before giving up a run. These are the same Phils that the Cubs scored a big dramatic win against on a Friday to take the first two games of a series. On Sat and Sunday after patting themselves on the backs and reading their own press clippings the Cubs showed up to the park apparently expecting the Phils to lay down to their greatness...only to lose both games. The Phils battled back down 0-2 in that series, won both games and salvaged a tie. THESE are the Phils that won the championship.

LEARN Cubs LEARN!

I'm sick of BS like this. It's the little things that win championships -- it's sweeping (not settling for 2 wins in a 3 game series vs the Reds and Pirates and Giants) the teams you need to beat. It's throwing strikes and playing good D and scoring key runs. It's cutting Bob Howry and keeping Scott Eyre. It's playing as hard on every play as the fans are cheering at every game (home and road). You want good "karma?" Then stop making bad decisions and hoping that you don't "mysteriously play bad" in the post season. Play every inning like it's Game 7 of the WS, then when you get there, you'll be ready for it. There are no "coincidences." There are no "Cub incidences." There's playing winning baseball and there's playing losing baseball.

I'm sick of watching these prima donnas mope around the field during the post season playing losing baseball because they got away with it during the regular season!

I hope someone has the 'nads to stand up at the Cubs convention this year and speak the truth...

Rant over.

 

Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: aggravated
 
 
Steve Prosapio
24 September 2008 @ 11:59 am
Enough bull-crap about the "jinxed" Cubs. Seriously. I've about had it.

Last night in a meaningless game for the Cubs, an opposing pitcher's bat shattered and the ball hit a section of the broken bat as it rolled on the infield. The pitcher got a hit instead of an out. Our pitcher had previously hit a batter, and subsequently gave up a walk and another hit. The Mets went on to tie the game that inning and win the game a few innings later when a pitcher (who has been injured for a month and is only getting work to see if he can pitch in the playoffs) gave up 4 runs in less than an inning's work.

Today I see on a website a Mets fan talking about "The Curse of the Black Bat." -- Are you freaking kidding me????

Let's put to rest all the bull$#!@ about jinxes, curses and bad luck.

1969:
The Cubs folded down the stretch in much less dramatic fashion as several teams in the past two years. Some idiot in NYC thinks it's funny to throw their cat on the field during a game and a black cat runs around the Cubs on deck circle. Curse? Black cat my azz......The Cubs had a crappy freakin' manager, a senile one at that, Leo Durocher who never gave our regular players (including our CATCHER, Randy Hundley who lost 20 lbs!) a freakin day off during two months of Aug/Sept daytime baseball. It's called stupidity, not "a jinx," "a hex," or "bad luck."

1970-1983:
Cubs fans suffered through the likes of Barry Foote, Steve "Stink" Ontoveris, Paul Rueshel, Jose Cardinal and a cast of dozens of idiotic low-talent players. Oh sure, we had Bill Matlock (went to Pittsburgh), Manny Trillo (went to Philly), Rick Rueshel (went to Pittsburgh) and Bruce Sutter (went to St. Louis/Atlanta) too but, well -- why have good players? It's called stupidity, not "a jinx," "a hex," or "bad luck."

1984:
Because the Cubs don't have night baseball, the league makes the decision to only give them 2 home games instead of 3. The order of the games is even pretty whacked in that we play two at Wrigley and then wave goodbye having to play three on the road. We'd have even won too had it not been for no bullpen (which led to a Steve Garvey home run) and a player doing drugs. Leon Durham did cocaine the night before game 5 and let a ball roll under his glove. It's called stupidity, not "a jinx," "a hex," or "bad luck."

2003:
I remember talking to my dad and my best friend that summer about why the Cubs were madly trying to add players when this wasn't their year to win it yet. They over-achieved and somehow managed to get a lead in the NLCS. Dusty "let them play" Baker doesn't settle the team down after a fan partially obstructs what would have been a phenomenal (but meaningless at the time) defensive play. Dusty "let them play" Baker sits on his azz after Cubs shortstop, Alex Gonzalez boots what should have been an easy double play. Dusty "let them play" Baker leaves an obviously exhausted Mark Prior in to face the Marins and he is hit hard. Dusty "let them play" Baker does not settle the team down that night, nor get them focused to play the next night in Game 7 with our Ace pitcher on the mound.

It's called stupidity, not "a jinx," "a hex," or "bad luck."

2008:
(look at that date again, 2008!) All that is over now and we've got a STUD GM who signs players while on his hospital bed, a great Manager who has won as a player and a coach, loud and enthusiastic fans, and terrific players. Will we win it all? Maybe or maybe not but let THESE players, this team, off the freakin hook for years and years of mismanagement (in Dusty's case NO management). They'll win or not win but it will be on abilities and skill (and a little luck) not on some stupid excuse of a curse because 70 years ago livestock wasn't (and still isn't, by the way) allowed at a game.

As fans, we hold THIS TEAM accountable for what THIS TEAM produces. When they suck, we have every right to 'boo.' When they get too full of themselves, we have every right to complain and demand they come back to earth. Before going on to win two World Series Championships, the Boston Red Sox FIRED their manager and their fans supported that/expected it because losing was no longer tolerable. The mindset of "we'll just take it because we're Cub fans and we love them" has got to go. We deserve to win. We should expect to win.

But that comes at a price. When the Cubs are good (and this year they are very good) we need to be positive and stop expecting some "other shoe to drop." That kind of thinking/mindset can only hurt. Collectively, Cub Nation wields a tremendous energy for positive or negative. I truly believe that. There WILL be some bumps along the way THIS YEAR but they'll be bumps associated with THIS TEAM. This is clearly the best team in the National League this year and we should expect to go to the World Series, nothing else is acceptable because THIS TEAM is in a position to earn that, to achieve it. We can hold them accountable AND support them with positive energy. For those of us unable to attend the games, it's all we can do and it's all we need do!

Go Cubs!
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: irritated
 
 
Steve Prosapio
16 July 2008 @ 03:21 pm

I was at a concert last night (Cheap Trick, Heart, and Journey) tickets courtesy of my best friend, Dave K. A great time but I missed a great All Star game. The All Star Break is just a God-aweful time of year, sports wise. I mean there isn't even any basketball or hockey for me to pretend to be into. No football, not even any mid-week golf.  At least it's just a 3 day time span.

I went to the
Cubs website today and there is a Q&A on there. The second question got my blood a boiling and I just had to respond (below) what MY answer would be. Of course, the beat writer's response was much kinder....

I can understand the acquisition of Harden but in shipping off Eric Patterson, 
Matt Murton, Sean Gallagher and Josh Donaldson, do you think the Cubs gave up 
too much young talent for a guy who has been plagued by injuries?
-- Jake M., Lafayette, Ind.

(What MY response would have been!)
Jake, are you an idiot? Do your parents make your lunch for you in the morning and then put you on a short bus on your way to "school?" Do you drool a lot? Wake your a - - up and start learning about the game of baseball, Jake. In shipping Patterson, Murton, Gallagher and a catcher hitting .217 at A-ball, the Cubs got a potential All Star and another stud long relief/spot starter. Unless you're like Rip Van Winkle, Jake, you might have noticed that the Cubbies haven't been to the World Series in a few years and most fans (as well as managment) are anxious to win a championship. You don't win championships with Corey Patterson's little brother, Jake. You certainly don't win them with Matt Murton starting on your team. Jake, get the f-ing glue bottle out of your nose and pay attention to the game. Did you happen to see Harden strike out TEN players in 5 innings during his first Cub start? Did you think that was a practice game, you BLEEPing moron? Whatever you do, Jake, don't leave Lafayette, Ind. Ever! Never ever, you hear me, Jake? Don't come to the big city where people will pick your pocket and shove your face into garbage. Or maybe you like that you stupid hillbilly? In any case, Jake, thanks for watching the Cubbies and be sure to put your name in all your coloring books!
Tags: ,
 
 
Current Mood: tired
 
 
Steve Prosapio
24 March 2008 @ 10:36 am



On Bookday, we have Dr. Seymour Garte, author of Where We Stand: A Surprising Look at the Real State of Our Planet.

From Publishers Weekly
Garte, a professor of public health, presents a well-researched, clearly written summary of the health of our planet, with histories of lead paint, ozone and various chemicals as well as analyses of human health and planetary health; the prognosis is surprisingly optimistic, and prescriptions are encouraging. While the environmental problems hyped daily on the news are real and ongoing, things have improved-air and water are cleaner, more food is available, life spans are up and infant mortality is down, diseases are better understood and treated-and will continue to improve if efforts continue. Garte points out the fallacies in standard right- and left-wing approaches-the planet is not in imminent danger of imploding, he says, but neither will it be saved by the free market-and shows how most improvements over the past 40 years have been the result of government intervention. Garte's reasoned discussion and compelling, honest tone make this a valuable tool for increasing science literacy with regards to the important environmental issues of the day; Garte's recommendations, to "continue on the paths we have been traveling and finally acknowledge the great progress that we have already made" should put new wind in discouraged environmentalists' sails, while plentiful references, data and illustrations will give skeptics material to think over.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.




Sy will be available Wednesday evening (EDT) to answer any specific questions or comments that you have about his book/topic.

On Thursday, I and Geoffrey Edwards will be hosting a live chat on gather.com for Cait Murphy, author of Crazy '08.



From Publishers Weekly
Starred Review. It's been almost a century since the loopy shenanigans of 1908 that produced what Fortune magazine editor Cait Murphy calls "the year that baseball comes of age," but the resultant drama has hardly faded with time. Although baseball books tend to sag with nostalgia, Murphy's wisecracking yarn digs right into the era's brawling, vivid ugliness with little regard for such niceties, and is all the better for it. Her book is so rife with corruption, greed, stupidity and downright weirdness that it makes today's sport of sanctimony and clean behavior look positively sleepy in comparison. This isn't surprising, given that 1908 was not just the last year that the shockingly victorious Chicago Cubs made it to the World Series, but also the year when a game would be called a tie through sheer Rashomon-like confusion and when a game day riot would take the lives of two people. The titanic matches between the rival Cubs and New York Giants are thrilling enough, but what really makes Murphy's book an addictive pleasure is the joy the author takes in the colorful asides where she fills in the chaotic blanks of an America discovering not just the joy of its national pastime but its very character. (Mar.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 
 
Current Mood: thoughtful
 
 
Steve Prosapio
21 March 2008 @ 01:45 pm
Poll #1158244 Cubbies
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 2

In 2008 the Cubs will:

View Answers

Fail to win the division.
0 (0.0%)

Win the division but fall again in the NLDS.
1 (50.0%)

Advance to the NLCS but lose.
0 (0.0%)

Win the NL but not the World Series.
0 (0.0%)

Win it all!
1 (50.0%)

Tags: ,
 
 
Current Mood: tired
 
 
Steve Prosapio
Here we are at the “Cubby Bear.”
 

The Cubby Bear is not just a bar, it's the bar across the street from one of the most beautiful places on earth, home of the Chicago Cubs, Wrigley Field.



I arrive early and relive memories from when I was here last fall. My sister and I met up with my friend Jason (the guy I went to AZ for the playoffs with). The Cubs had just swept the Pittsburgh Pirates and took what turned out to be an insurmountable lead in the playoff race. Of course we won’t talk about what happened in the playoffs. Before I have a chance to get comfortable, Geoffrey Edwards appears in the doorway.

Okay, I'll be honest, he eclipses the doorway.

A towering figure, Geoffrey sees me and advances towards the table that I've secured for us. I extend my hand, but he brushes it away in favor of a bear hug that would be admired by Brian Urlacher.

We sit down and Geoffrey orders a Wrigley Field favorite, an Old Style beer. I consider a white wine but, as if reading my mind, Geoffrey glares at me until I order a relatively premium beer for Chicago, a Coors Lite.

After a bit of small talk, our drinks come and we toast to the Cubs winning the World Series in 2008. And then we get down to business.
 
Steve Prosapio: Geoffrey, there is a moment when an author decides unequivocally that he/she is going to follow through with their desire to write a novel. Tell me about yours.
 
Geoffrey Edwards: I had toyed with the ideas at the heart of the novel in my head for a little while before I put pen to paper. Once I began writing, however, I never once thought about stopping. I really thought I had a good story to tell and I was damn well going to tell it. But there was never the epiphany that I have heard others mention. I just loved being a writer, and I didn’t want to do anything else (That feeling remains. However, my wife insists the heating bill must be paid.).
 
SP: Fire Bell in the Night opens with an emotional prologue. Did you go through a range of emotions while writing it?
 
GE: The prologue deals with a small slave uprising on a Georgia plantation. And writing it was a grueling task. The only time I ever became emotional throughout the writing process was when I was creating this slave world. I think the ability to empathize is tremendously important for writers. Unfortunately, we can leave ourselves vulnerable because of that. I will say that I knew I had succeeded when one Stephen Prosapio read my prologue and assumed I was black. That was about the best compliment I think anyone could have given me.
 
[Ed note: That’s true! To my credit, however, I remained friends with him even after I learned he was really…ugly. Okay, okay, I'm kidding. Here is a picture of Geoffrey. Please keep in mind that he is not the same size as those skyscrapers. He's closer to the camera and is slightly smaller than some of them!]
 
 
SP: How long did it take you to write the book? Were there any periods during its writing that you stalled?
 
GE: The book took 2 years, which included 6 months of research. I never really had an extended stall over that time. But, also, if something was bothering me, or a scene was giving me problems, I took the non-confrontational route – I skipped it. I found that working around my problems was the best course for me.
 
SP: Okay. Good strategy.  So Jeff, what has been the most fun part of being a published writer?
 
GE: Just a few weeks back I was asked to come back to my high school and speak to the students. I hadn’t been back since I graduated 15 years ago. It was surreal – they escorted me around like some celebrity and the teachers all fawned over me like I was God’s gift. By the time I left, I wouldn’t have been surprised if they told me they had renamed the school in my honor. When we leave high school, we all would like to think if we ever go back it would be to that kind of reception. I was lucky enough to have it happen.
 
SP: That’s a phenomenal story. Geoffrey, what was the first book you can remember having an influence on you?
 
GE: Believe it or not, I hated reading as a child. I was too active, too busy. However, my mother read The Lord of the Rings to me aloud when I was very little. I was mesmerized, and can still actually quote passages from the books that I committed to memory. So, I suppose, J.R.R. had a profound impact on me.
 
SP: What are your top 3 novels of all time?
 
GE:
1)     The Great Gatsby
2)     The Sun Also Rises
3)     The Killer Angels
 
SP: What are your 3 favorite time-periods in history?
 
GE: I’m obviously fascinated by the Civil War Era in American History.  I was a Colonial American history major, so that time period, with all its hope, doubt, and danger, has always held the strongest allure.
 
Beyond that, I am fascinated by the ancient civilizations that grew up in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Meso-America.
 
SP:  Interesting. So if you could go back in time to one time-period, which would it be and why? What would you do there?
 
GE: I would LOVE to go back to Ancient Greece in the time of Athenian power. The evolution of ideas was as dramatic as our technological evolution of the last 100 years. I would just speak with as many of the scholars, philosophers, and politicians as I possibly could. I would also love to see an Olympiad. People walked from all corners of Greece for these events, and hundreds of thousands would congregate for weeks of drinking, feasting, and sport. (Sounds a bit like the Cubs in the playoffs.)
 
SP: What one historical lesson do you feel, as Americans, we could/should be learning from right now.
 
GE: Interesting question. 
 
SP: Why thank you. I assume you have an interesting answer.
 
GE: (laughs) I think, that I would tell the populace to take a look back at the great empires or civilizations of the past and recognize the events that predated their collapse. One might be a bit scared to see familiar signs in American culture. One thing that we often overlook is that democracy is not some God given right, nor is it the natural proclivity of man. We have been given this amazing gift by the founding fathers; a gift that subsequent generations have protected with their blood and their ideals. We must understand the lessons passed down to us and act accordingly.
 
SP: Good point, Geoffrey. As Thomas Jefferson said, "The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance."  What’s your next book about? How far along are you with it and when do you hope to have it completed?
 
My next book is about a ghost writer, or pamphleteer, who lived in Boston in the time just before the American Revolution. These writers did not sign their own names because of the threat to them by the Crown. My story revolves around the radicalization of one such patriot, and the story involves vast conspiracy, misperceptions, and one hell of a twist at the end. Having said that, I haven’t even begun writing yet…still researching.
 
SP: Ah, research. The devil’s in the research! Okay my friend, enough of the literary questions. What about the Cubs this year? How do you like our chances of winning the Series this year?
 
GE: On this, the 100 year anniversary of our last championship, I predict the ultimate success. Of course, I’m a Cubs fan. What did you think I would say?
SP: Only the truth my friend. Only the truth.
 
We order another round (or two) and drink to the Cubs rightful place in the World Series, as well as our rightful place on the New York Times Best Seller List.
 
I hope you all take the opportunity to get the first edition of the debut novel of a great historical novelist. Fire Bell in the Night, by Geoffrey Edwards.




From Publishers Weekly
One of the two winners of the Gather.com First Chapters contest, Edwards's provocative debut begins in the summer of 1850 as the debate over the expansion of slavery into the Mexican Cession territory prompts threats of secession and war. A slave revolt and rumors that the leader of the uprising is roaming the countryside recruiting an army further frays nerves in Charleston, S.C. When a local farmer is caught harboring a runaway, he is charged with a capital crime. The New York Tribune sends young reporter John Sharp to cover the trial; he quickly befriends planter Tyler Breckenridge, the scion of one of the most powerful families in Charleston. But as Sharp and fellow reporter Owen Conway uncover clues of a covert militia buildup, Sharp begins to suspect that Breckenridge is involved. As the emotionally charged fugitive-slave trial unfolds, Sharp and Conway rush to expose the secessionist conspiracy and head off war. Edwards fills the gaps in the record of the Crisis of 1850 to produce a plausible scenario that eloquently captures the fear and rivalries of the antebellum era, though many passages could use a healthy pruning. For fans of historical fiction—and Civil War fiction particularly.
 
 
Current Mood: ecstatic
 
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize